This website uses cookies to enhance browsing experience. Read below to see what cookies we recommend using and choose which to allow.
By clicking Accept All, you'll allow use of all our cookies in terms of our Privacy Notice.
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
Data analytics is not a revolution in exploration, it’s an innovation.
It helps with our workflows and creates insight from data in a way geoscientists could not if working with traditional methods alone.
The current buzz around AI risks both under and overstating its impact on mineral exploration. Either would be a mistake. It is important we acknowledge both its limitations and its power.
When we do this and apply analytics practically, we’re seeing outsized results.
For example, we have worked on both large geochemical databases and huge drillcore image banks with great success. For the former, the key was the identification of trends through the combination of very specific datasets analysed with context. For the latter, it was largely the volume of data that was unmanageable and needed a solution. In both cases, the technology delivered huge efficiencies.
In contrast, we’ve done tests on large language models and despite some exciting successes, we found significant limitations to the technology.
This emphasises the need to test what does and doesn’t work with the technology as it stands today in its evolutionary journey. This is about being rational and working within those limitations.
In those examples of successful application, expert knowledge was instrumental in the results.
For the geochemistry project, the context needed was provided by the geoscientists driving the software. They moved the instructions and inputs to ensure the algorithm was trained on relevant in-ground examples. For the drillcore image-recognition project, quality control and selective intervention played a key role in the process.
We are not at the point where we can leave analytical software with a deposit of data and come back to insight. This may be the case one day, but we are not there yet.
In a best-practice example, geologists and data scientists would be working in the same team and combine their expertise to get valuable insight from data.
Click here to view more Future of Exploration articles and videos.
This thought leadership piece is in partnership with the Mining Journal's Future of Exploration.
While AI hasn’t revolutionized target generation, it is improving efficiency by reducing false positives and refining focus on viable targets. At depth, AI's predictive capabilities hold more transformative potential, but reaching that promise requires ongoing process changes.
Learn MoreSRK was commissioned by Jupiter Mines in 2011 to provide feasibility study proposals and resource reviews for their Mt Mason hematite deposit in the Yilgarn region of Western Australia.
Learn More